论文标题:评公司法人人格否认理论
On Theory of Disregarding Corporate"s Legal Personality
论文作者 李晖
论文导师 孟勤国,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 政治经济学
论文单位 广西大学,点击次数 2312,论文页数 45页File Size2140k
2001-05-01论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_106187/ 公司,公司法人人格否认,有限责任,出资人,股东
corporate,disregard of the corprate"s legal personality,limited liability,investor,shareholder
九十年代以来，学术界对公司法人人格否认理论的研究渐呈热潮。论者几乎一致认为应当引进该理论，以弥补有限责任的缺陷、遏制股东滥用公司法人人格行为。笔者对此持不同的见解。本文分四个部分，分别对论者引以为支撑的三个论据进行了考察、辨析；在此基础上区别不同情况提出了制度替代的基本构想。 第一部分对美、英、德、日适用公司法人人格否认理论的实践状况、不同特点及原因进行考察，由此说明各国并没有形成相对统一的规则和学说。 第二部分分析了我国清理整理公司的系列政策法和司法解释，指出其并未突破有限责任原则，与公司法人人格否认理论有着根本的区别，并对其作用做出评价。 第三部分对公司法人人格否认与有限责任的关系进行了理论辨析。认为有限责任的本质是出资人对公司的一次性出资义务；出资人法律地位发生变化后，以股东身份所为之不法行为不能受到有限责任的保护；现实中出现的“公司问题”不应都归因于有限责任。因此，没有必要以否认公司法人人格为手段追究有关股东的无限责任。 第四部分对主要的滥用公司法人人格的行为予以分类，拟在现有法律框架中寻求解决途径。
Since 1990"s,more and more research is done on the theory of disregardingcorporate"s legal personality among China"s scholars It"s almost agreed that theintroduction of this theory is needed so as to make up the defects of limited ciabicityand refrain the shareholder"s act of misusing cooprate"s legal personality Yet theauthor has different opinion. This thesis has four parts which respectively analysesthree so-called grounds of arguments and the author"s own legislative planIn the first part,the Pract1ce、featuers and reasons of this theory in U S A.Bntain. Germany and Japan are analysed. A conclusion is then drawn that there"s noshared regulation and theoriesIn the second ped, China"s relevafit political laws and Judiclal interpretation areanalysed. It"s pointed out that China still holds pnnciple of limited liability which isdifferent from the theory of repudiating corporate"s legal personalityIn the third part, the relationship between theones of disregad of corporate"slegal personality and limited liability is elabotated. It"s held that the essence lf limitedliability is the investor"s lumpsum contflbution obligation towards the corporateWhen his legal status cboges, the investor"s inlegal act as shareholder can"t beprotected by limiter liability Nevertheless, it"s unnecessary to look into relevantshareholder"s unlimited liability by means of disregarding corporate"s legalpersonalityIn the fourth part the main acts of mlsusing corporate"s legal personality isclasslfied and some proposals are put forward
|
