论文标题:股东知情权及其诉讼救济研究
A Study on the Right to Know and the Lawsuit Relief of Shareholders
论文作者
论文导师 李建伟,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 民商法学
论文单位 中国政法大学,点击次数 110,论文页数 50页File Size3347K
2007-03-01论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_138225157/
the Right to Know of Shareholders;; Lawsuit Relief;; System Construction
股东知情权是股东一项十分重要的权利，是股东能够行使表决权、监督权等其它股东权的前提及基础。在“所有权和经营权相分离”的公司治理原则下，公司管理层利用手中掌握的信息优势，侵犯股东知情权的现象频繁发生。在这样的背景下，世界上很多国家公司法都确立了股东知情权制度。我国2005年《公司法》明确规定了股东享有知情权及其受到侵害时的股东诉权，相比1993年《公司法》在股东知情权的保护方面有了很大进步，但是公司法在股东知情权行使的条件以及股东知情权诉讼的程序方面仍然存在很多缺陷，导致股东知情权保护在实践中的可操作性不强。因此，有必要对公司法中股东知情权及其诉讼救济制度加以再完善。 本文共分引言、正文、结语三个部分。 引言部分介绍了写作背景和目的，为后面的写作打下基础。 正文共分三部分： 第一部分为股东知情权及其行使。股东知情权不是制定法上的概念，学理上没有统一的概念。本文首先分析了股东知情权的概念，得出股东知情权是一系列权利的集合。股东知情权的法理基础在于股东资格。并对股东知情权的性质及其制度价值进行了探讨。本部分最后介绍了几种主要的股东知情权行使方法以及世界上主要国家的立法例。 第二部分为有限公司股东知情权诉讼救济。作者从股东知情权的救济途径入手，得出诉讼救济是股东知情权救济的最终途径。知情权诉讼的性质从民事诉讼理论上应为给付之诉，从公司股权的角度看属于直接诉讼的范畴。简要分析了股东知情权诉讼的基本结构，通过对有限公司和股份有限公司的比较分析，可以看出股东知情权诉讼的价值主要体现在对有限公司股东知情权的救济上。 第三部分为我国公司法上股东知情权及其诉讼救济的再完善。这是本文的核心部分。通过历史比较的方法，分析了我国股东知情权制度的立法例演变、现状，指出了我国现行公司法对于股东知情权制度的不足，提出了完善的建议。然后考察了我国现行立法以及司法实践中在股东知情权诉讼制度上存在的问题，对股东知情权诉讼救济进行了具体制度的构建。 结语部分总结了全文的观点，重申了完善股东知情权及其诉讼救济制度的重要性。
The right to know of shareholders is a very important right, which is the premise and base for shareholders to execute the right of management and property. Depending on the administrative principle of "separation between proprietorship and management power", utilizing the advantageous information in hand, the corporate management frequently infringe the right to know of shareholders. Under this circumstances, the company laws of numerous countries have established the system of the right to know of shareholders. In the 2005 Company Law, our country definitely prescribed that shareholders have the right to know and the lawsuit right when infringed. Compared with the 1993 Company Law, on one hand, it gets ahead deeply in the protection of the right to know of shareholders, but on the other hand, there exist still many limitations in the executive conditions of the right to know and the lawsuit procedure of shareholders, which results in the realistic difficulty to protect the right to know of shareholders. Therefore, the system of the right to know of shareholders in the Company Law entails its re-improvement. This dissertation includes three sections: the introduction, the body and the epilogue. The part of the introduction presents the writing background and aims to lay a solid foundation for the following writing. The part of the body are divided into three sub-sections. The first sub-section is about the right to know of shareholders as well as its execution. It is known that the right to know of shareholders is not a concept in the positive law, so it is difficult to define. However, through efforts, this dissertation first analyzes the concept, to educe that the right to know of shareholders is a collection of a series of rights and that its law theory builds on the shareholdership. Then, this sub-section discusses the nature and the system value of the right to know of shareholders. Finally it introduces some main executions and some legislation cases of some main countries. The second sub-section is about the lawsuit relief of the right to know of shareholders. Starting from the economic approaches, the author concludes that the lawsuit relief is the ultimate approach of the relief of the right to know. The nature of the lawsuit should be give lawsuit from the theory of civil lawsuit; direct lawsuit from the corporate shareholding. This sub-section briefly analyzes the basic structure of the right to know of shareholders, and infers that its value is embodied in the relief of the right to know of the shareholders in the limited liability company. The third sub-section is about the re-improvement of the right to know of shareholders as well as the lawsuit relief in our Company Law. By historical comparision, this sub-section analyzes the historical development and the current situation, indicates the deficiencies of our country"s current company law, and brings forward the suggestions of re-improvement. The author reviews our country"s current legislation and the existing problems in the system of the: right to know of shareholders in justice practice and constructs the concrete system of the lawsuit relief of the right to know of shareholders. The part of the epilogue concludes the viewpoints of the whole passage, and re-stresses the re-improvement of the system of the right to know and the lawsuit relief system of shareholders.
|
