论文标题:论程序公正在我国法治建设中的作用
On the Function of the Procedural Fairness in Constructing Our Country under the Rule of Law
论文作者 段鹏飞
论文导师 赖雄麟；叶江,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 马克思主义理论与思想政治教育
论文单位 西安科技大学,点击次数 305,论文页数 58页File Size2681k
2005-04-25论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_1531227/ 程序法;程序公正;司法公正;法治
Procedural; law Procedural fairness; Judicial fairness ;The rule of law
法治必须以司法公正为其首要价值追求,“依法治国,建设社会主义法治国家”已成为我国的治国方略,这必然要求我国实现司法公正。我国要实现司法公正,就必须从重实体公正向重程序公正转变。程序公正是一种过程的公正,它有其独立价值,主要体现于法律程序的设计和司法裁判过程中,它以明确、具体且可操作的程序规范为特征。 程序公正是司法公正的核心内容,是司法公正得以实现的保障,这是当代法治社会的共识。依法治国,在某种意义上可以说首先是依程序治国,一个国家的法治水平在很大程度上取决于公正的程序。 然而长期以来,人们在理论和实践中一味地重视实体法及其运行,强调实体公正,忽视了程序法的作用,尤其不重视程序公正,把程序法仅仅作为实现实体法的工具和手段,体现在立法和司法领域中就是“重实体轻程序”,这种观念造成我国司法实践中程序观念滞后,程序法不健全,程序违法行为十分严重。 针对我国“重实体轻程序”、“重结果轻过程”的法律传统,我们要进行法治建设,就应当特别重视程序法及程序公正在法治建设中的重要作用,而不能一味地追求实体上的公正。为此,文章在借鉴西方法治国家程序公正的价值标准和功能的基础上,分析了传统中国和现代中国轻视程序法及程序公正的原因,重新审视了程序公正在我国法治建设中的重要作用,从而为我国程序法的良好运行和程序公正的实现以及顺利建设社会主义法治国家提供了科学有效的对策。
The rule of law must pursue judicial fairness as its first value, governing the country according to law and constructing socialist country under the rule of law has already been our country’s governing strategy, this certainly requires realizing judicial fairness. We must transform from emphasizing substantive law to emphasizing procedural law in order to realize judicial fairness. Procedural fairness is a kind of process justice; it has independent values, mainly embodied in the process of law procedural design and judicial judge. It is characterized as clear, concrete and workable procedural standard. Procedural fairness is the central content of judicial fairness, it is the guarantee of achieving judicial fairness, and this is the common sense. Ruling the country by law firstly means ruling the country by procedural law in some meaning. The level of the rule of law of a certain country lies in the just procedural law to great extent. However, for a long time, people only stressed substantive law and its performance in theories and practices, stressed substantive fairness and neglected the function of procedural law, especially ignored procedural fairness. People only regarded procedural law as tools and means to realize the substantive law. “Emphasizing substantive, neglecting procedure” is the embodiment in the field of legislation and jurisdiction; this idea made procedural opinions backward, procedural law imperfect, procedural violence worse in our judicial practices. According to legal tradition of “emphasizing substantive, neglecting procedure” and “emphasizing result, neglecting process” in China, if we want to construct our country under the rule of law, the important function of procedural law and procedural fairness should be specially stressed in the construction of our country under the rule of law, not to only pursue substantive justice. For this reason, the thesis absorbed the values, standard and function of the procedural fairness in the west countries under the rule of law, analyzed the reasons for neglecting procedural law and procedural fairness in traditional China and modern China, inspected again the important function of procedural fairness in the construction of our country under the rule of law. Thus it can provide us with scientific and effective strategies for the sound working of our procedural law, the realization of procedural fairness and smooth establishment of socialist country under the rule of law.
|
