论文标题:反垄断法的价值研究
Slippery Slope Arguments and Their Application to Legal Reasoning
论文作者 潘登
论文导师 种明钊,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 经济法学
论文单位 西南政法大学,点击次数 256,论文页数 32页File Size1872k
2002-04-01论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_2023927/ 云南;边境贸易;实践研究
divorcing juristic consequences, matrimonial property system, reparations for damages, and substantial justice.
本文共分四个部分对反垄断法的价值进行了初步的探讨。在第一部分对法律价值一般理论的介绍和第二部分反垄断法价值的比较分析之基础上，笔者于第三部分提出了反垄断的价值取向为经济自由的观点，第四部分阐述了我国反垄断法中的两个具体问题。 第一部分笔者对研究反垄断法的价值所要涉及的一些法律价值的一般理论进行了简要的介绍，包括法的价值的含义、法的价值观以及效益价值、平等价值和自由价值。同时提出了反垄断法的“经济宪法”地位及其价值定位的终极哇、基本性。 第二部分对当今世界各国的反垄断法的价值作出了比较性地介绍，重点分析了美国、欧盟和德国反垄断法的价值取向。并在此基础上对上述三国的反垄断法的价值进行了简要评价，并且从中得出了我国确定反垄断法价值目标的几点启示。 第三部分，笔者提出自己的观点，认为反垄断法的价值应定位为经济自由，而经济效益和经济公平应是经济自由的合理延伸。在对经济自由价值进行集中论述的基础上，笔者比较了合同自由和经济自由，并提出合同法和反垄断法应为市场经济的基本法。 第四部分，本文对行政垄断是否应纳入反垄断法调整的问题进行了探讨，笔者对此持否定态度，并提出了三点理由。最后对作为反垄断法例外的合法垄断的价值取向作了简要介绍。
The thesis consists of four parts, making a preliminary inquiry into the value of the antimonopoly law. Basing on the introduction to the general theory about the value of law in part one and the comparative analysis of the value of antimonopoly law, the author explains his position that the value of antimonopoly law is economic liberties and finally the author expound two specific question of antimonopoly law in part four.In part I the author makes a brief introduction to the general theory of the value of law which is necessary to study the value of antimonopoly law, including the connotation of the value of law, the outlook on the value of law, the beneficial value, the equality value and the liberty value. And meanwhile, the author points out that the antimonopoly law is an "economic constitution" and it"s value-orientation is ultimate and basic.In part II the author gives a brief information about the value of the antimonopoly law of different countries in the world from a comparative perspective, esp about the value-orientation of U. S, EU and German, on this base, the author makes a brief appraisal of the value of antimonopoly law in these three countries, tram which the author draws some lessons about how to determine the value objectives of Chinese antimonopoly law.In part III the author demonstrates that the value of antimonopoly law should be the economic liberties, while the economics benefit and equality should be the reasonable estuation of the economic liberties. Focusing on the exposition of the value of economic liberties, the author compares the contract freedom with economic liberties and then suggests that the contract law and antimonopoly law should be the principle laws in the market economy.In part IV discourses whether the executine monopolies should beregulated by antimouopolies law or not. The authors produces three reasons to prove that the executive monopolies should not be regulated by ant monopoly law. And finally the author makes a brief introduction to the value-orientation of the lawful monopolies which is an exception to the ant monopoly law.
|
