论文标题:制度与观念的契合：罪刑法定原则在中国的实现
Correspondence between System and Ideas: The Realities of Principle of Legality in China
论文作者 周力娜
论文导师 高跃先,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 刑法学
论文单位 四川大学,点击次数 101,论文页数 57页File Size2413k
2004-04-14论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_241578457/ 罪刑法定原则;罪刑擅断;限制权力;保障权利
Principle of Legality; Principle of Illegality Restriction of state power; Guarantee of human rights
罪刑法定原则作为近现代刑法的基本原则，旨在通过限制刑罚权力来达到保障人权的目的，其中蕴涵着对于刑事立法和司法道德的双重顾虑，及其对于个体自由和权利的深层关怀。本文试从罪刑法定原则在西方的成长历程入手，详细介绍了罪刑法定所赖以依存的人文、经济和理论等历史背景，对比阐明了在义务本位的传统中国该原则难以生成的原因。进而指出，虽然中国1997年刑法典已明确了罪刑法定原则的法律地位，但碍于传统文化思维逻辑的延续和当前政府“追赶式”的法治推进，罪刑法定原则完整的限制机理并未能有效渗透于现行刑法当中，并尤为突出地反映在人们对于刑事立法的过度依赖和推崇，一味强调的只是罪刑法定对于刑事司法权力的限制，而完全忽略了立法权力在外界的放纵与自我的膨胀之中，对个体权利的挑衅和进攻。反映在制度层面上，便是刑法典的日渐扩充和修正案的频频出台。 对此，笔者意欲说明的是，罪刑法定原则所要规制的绝不仅仅是刑事司法的擅断，防止刑事立法的擅定同样是其立足于权利保障的应然期待。制度上的完善最终是为了能实现制度背后的理性，而保障权利和限制权力便是在罪刑法定的倡导下，中国当前的刑法制度所应极力彰显的理性。毕竟，我们的时代期待于法治的不仅仅是要它建立法律秩序，而且是想通过日趋成熟的法律手段或多或少地从根本上来改造我们滞后的价值观念和社会的运转模式。因此，为了能达成制度与观念的最终契合，我们必须完整再现罪刑法定原则的权力限制机理，以期在其倡导个体权利的价值构想中，真正唤醒国民的自觉，继续中国刑事法治的漫漫征程。
As the fundamental principle of modernization of criminal law, the aim of Principle of Legality is to restrict the state" s power and guarantee the human rights. It implies the worries about morals of criminal legislation and criminal justice, in the same time, the cares for civil liberties and human rights. This dissertation, under the course of Principle of Legality in the richness, makes a probe into the root cause of the absence of this principle in the Chinese traditional society. Then the artic points out, Principle of Legality formed in the 1997" s Chinese criminal law, even so, because of the traditional resistance and the engagement in the rule of law pursuits, the sprit of the principle has not been merged in the system of criminal law, which is especially reflected on the legislative power in which people are too trust to lead it that expands to the state power limits that sets by Principle of Legality, and threatens the human rights directly.So the author wants to explain that what dose Principle of Legality restrict, including both the judicial power and legislative power. As a result, in order to promote the correspondence between the system and ideas, we should express the limited function of Principle of Legality completely, in the meantime, we should go on the expedition to the rule of criminal law in the field of the human rights.
|
