论文标题:滥用职权罪法律适用研究
Marx"s Thought of Economic Globalization and China"s Open-up
论文作者 郭献民
论文导师 孙利,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 法律
论文单位 对外经济贸易大学,点击次数 134,论文页数 42页File Size2071k
2004-09-01论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_2831197/ 滥用职权;法律适用;徇私舞弊
Administrative Staff, Salary, Research
本文分八个部分,侧重于从法律适用角度对滥用职权罪进行研究。首先,通过对滥用职权罪的由来、滥用职权的含义的介绍和说明,比较地得出滥用职权罪的定义。其次,对滥用职权罪的构成进行研究,指出滥用职权罪的客体主要是国家机关的正常管理秩序或正常活动秩序;客观方面表现为违反法律、法规等有关规定,逾越职权、不正确履行职责或者不履行职责的行为,并要求有严重危害后果的发生,二者之间具有刑法上的因果关系。本罪主体是国家机关工作人员,仍具有在国家机关工作的资格和依法从事国家公务两个条件。本罪在主观上可以是故意,也可以表现为过失,但实施滥用职权行为则表现为故意。其三,从徇私舞弊犯滥用职权罪的构成、滥用职权罪的罪数认定、滥用职权罪与玩忽职守罪的界定三个方面对滥用职权罪的司法认定进行了具体论述。其中指出,徇私既可以是滥用职权罪主观方面的犯罪动机,也可以是滥用职权行为的目的,还是构成是主客观方面的一个法定加重情节。它不仅存在于故意犯罪,还存在于过失犯罪。滥用职权罪的因果关系、主体条件、罪过形态、徇私舞弊情节的认定是本文的特色。
Divided into 8 parts, this thesis is supposed to conduct research on the crime of abusing power mainly based on the perspective of legal applicability.Firstly, through the introduction and explanation on the origin of crime of abusing power and the implication of abusing power, this thesis draws the definition of crime of abusing power by contrastive methodology.Secondly, the thesis performs research on the constitution of crime of abusing power, pointing out that the object of crime of abusing power mainly refers to the normal administrative order or the normal action order of the State Organs, that the external form of power-abuse refers to the behavior of breaching the relative regulations of the law and statutes, behaving beyond one’s authority, performing one’s duty improperly or nonperforming one’s duty, which must cause serious outcomes and there must exist a legal causality between the behavior and the resulted outcome. The subject of this crime is the state organ staffs who are qualified for two conditions: possessing the title of working in the state organs and conducting national public affairs by law. Subjectively, this crime may be committed either intentionally or negligently, but the conduction of this crime must be intentional.Thirdly, deliberate discussion on the judicial cognizance of crime of abusing power is to be carried out from three aspects: the constitution of crime of abusing power, the cognizance of crime of abusing power and the definition of crime of abusing power and misprision crime. It is pointed out in this thesis that practicing favoritism may be the subjective criminal motive of crime of abusing power or the goal of the behavior of abusing power. In addition, it may also be a legal aggravating plot of subjective and objective aspect, which appears both in intentional crime and in negligence crime.The causality of crime of abusing power, the subject conditions, the crime types as well as the cognizance of jobbery plots remain to be the feature of this thesis.
|
