论文标题:我国司法实践中的股东知情权相关问题研究
Investigation on the Shareholders" Right to Information from the Viewpoint of Chinese Judicial Practice
论文作者
论文导师 孙效敏,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 经济法学
论文单位 华东政法学院,点击次数 638,论文页数 52页File Size1257K
2007-10-30论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_301372/
Judicial practice;; Shareholders’right to information;; Correlative issues
为强化股东对经营管理人的监督和制衡,周全地保护公司利益免受各种不正当行为的侵害并最终使股东获得最佳实益,股东知情权作为股东行使其他股东权利的必要手段和媒介,已成为全面保护股东权益的重要一环。近几年,审判实践中不断出现股东知情权案件,由此也发现了不少法律适用问题,本文对股东知情权的历史发展、审判实务中出现的股东知情权案件的情况进行调查分析,以期对股东知情权制度本身及其司法救济制度的完善有所裨益。 本文分为四章,分别从“股东知情权的含义及其发展”、“我国股东知情权制度的基本特征和内容”、“审判实践中股东知情权案件的基本情况”以及“建立股东知情权综合保障体系”等对我国司法实践中的股东知情权相关问题进行论述。 第一章着重阐述了股东知情权的含义及其发展。首先,笔者简要介绍了股东知情权的概念,并对其历史渊源及发展进行阐述。其次,对我国新旧公司法相关规定作了比较,指出立法者在制订有关股东知情权制度时,一方面在对待股东知情权问题上持一种积极的肯定态度,不仅从总体上吸收了原来法律的既有内容,同时还做了较大幅度的扩展,但另一方面,为维护公司的合法权益,公司法对股东知情权的行使又做了一定的限制性规定。 第二章着重分析了我国股东知情权制度的基本特征和内容。指出我国法律对股东知情权的内容、实现方式以及权利救济方式的制度设计均体现出一定的层级性特征,并对知情权权利主体、义务主体、对客体的要求以及权利行使的边界等内容进行了分析。 第三章笔者结合审判实践中股东知情权案件的情况,从涉讼主体、诉讼标的、案件成因及结案特点等方面分析了此类案件的诉讼特点。在对纠纷产生原因背景进行分析的基础上,提出相应的对策和建议,并就审判实务审理此类案件的价值导向作了阐述。 第四章笔者在前三章论述基础上,提出要从进一步强化公司内部约束机制、扩大监事会职权、改革公司登记管理制度、构建检查人选任请求权等四个方面建立股东知情权综合保障体系。
The shareholders’“right to information”(of the company’s operation),as a necessary means to exercise other rights of the shareholders , is playing an increasingly important role in the protection of shareholders’ultimate interests, such as intensifying the shareholders’supervision and restriction on the managers, protecting the company’s interests from any wrongful infringement. In the last few years, more and more problems have been found in judicial practices, and this thesis is going to give some suggestions to benefit the legal system and remedies of the shareholders’“right to information”by investigating its historical development and issues in judicial practices. This thesis is separated into 4 chapters, and discusses some correlative issues in Chinese judicial practice on the very right to information, from“Definition and development”,“native characters and contents”,“Situations of domestic judicial practice”,to“Suggestions on compositive protection”. Chapter 1 focuses on the definition and development of the right. First of all, the author brief the definition of the right and introduce its origin and development. Secondly, the author compare our country’s new company law with the old one, from which indicates the legislator’s developing positive attitude on one hand, while still some restrictions on the other hand. Chapter 2 focuses on native characters and contents of the right. From discussion on the contents, implement and remedies of the right, the author illuminates a character of cascade in our legal system , also gives her opinion on the subject , object and limitation to the exercise of the right and obligation. Chapter 3 focuses on situations of domestic judicial practice. The author analyses the characters of such litigations from aspects of its parties, subject matter and cause of formation. Based on these analyses, the author also gives suggestions on countermeasures and discusses the guidelines and value judgment during a trial on these cases. Chapter 4 makes out suggestions on protection of the right to information, the author advanced a theory of compositive protection system, comprising further inter restrictions, extended authority of supervisory board, innovation of registration administration and legislation suggestion on a right of choice on inspector.
|
