论文标题:梁启超文献学思想研究
Literatre Study to Liang QiChao"s Thought
论文作者 梁松涛
论文导师 时永乐,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 汉语言文字学
论文单位 河北大学,点击次数 179,论文页数 108页File Size1141k
2005-05-01论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_38929052/ 梁启超;文献学;理论实践;研究
Liang Qichao; literature study; theoretical practice; research
梁启超作为中国近代历史上的风云人物,前人已有大量研究,本文以《饮冰室合集》为第一手资料,从文献学这一领域入手,力图将其在文献学领域里的一系列理论构建阐述清楚,并在学术史上予以恰当的评价。因这篇文章是文献学论文,所以在绪言部分首先介绍了梁启超作品的结集出版情况。在文章主体部分,主要以梁启超对传统文献的整理、对文献具体类型及在文献的搜集和传播方面的研究着手,具体论述了他在文献学上的巨大贡献。在第一方面,主要阐述了梁启超在目录学、辨伪学、辑佚和校勘四个方面的贡献,并对其理论进行了梳理,阐明了各个理论体系的具体内容及对前人研究成果的有效吸收。第二个方面,分为方志研究和人物年谱理论研究。在方志学领域,上承章学诚方志理论体系,下启民国方志学渊源,明确提出了方志学这一科学概念。尤其在人物年谱的研究上,具体论述了人物年谱的编纂体例和方法。其理论独树一帜,开创新之先河。第三个方面,以梁启超的图书馆学研究和文献传播的实践活动为例,阐明了他在近现代学术转型时期新的文献观念。他积极创办图书馆,参与图书馆活动,尤其在图书的分类方法上,既根据中国古籍的自身特点,又结合杜威的十分法,将图书类目分为学、政、教、杂四类,大大方便了读者。在文献的传播上更是不遗余力,开学会,办报纸,译书籍,编书目,扩大文献在民众中传播,真正达到了广科学、启民智、开风气的传播效果。总之,梁启超在文献学上的一系列理论建树,在中国近现代文献学的发展中的诸多领域都是发凡起例,既承前人之精微,又启后学之津梁。在文章的结尾,又分析了梁启超文献学思想产生的社会历史背景及其在文献学研究上的不足。综观全文,主要论述了梁启超在文献学理论和实践上的贡献,其一系列文献学的思想和成就代表了中国古代学术的终结和现代学术的起源。
Liang Qichao, as a well-known figure in modern history in China, whose works havebeen studied by previous scholars. This thesis, using .Collection of YinBingshi as the first-handmaterial, starts with philology, and hence elaborates Liang Qichao’s Collection of YinBingshiphilological theoretical structure, and gives it a proper assessment.As a thesis of literature study, it tells readers in the introduction part, some informationabout the publication of this works In the principal part of the article, the focus is on LiangQichao ‘s great contribution to the reorganization of traditional literature, the specifical studyof different types of literature, and the collection and spread of literature. Firstly, the thesisillustrates Liang Qichao’s contributions to catalogue study, distinguishing of ancient books,compiling and collating them, and sorts out all the theories concerned, expounding the contentsof each theory and at the same time absorbing the achievements made by previous researchers.Secondly, the thesis researches on local literature and people’s chronicle separately. As forlocal literature, it borrows the heritage of Zhang Xuecheng’s theory, and absorbs the study oflocal literature initiating in the Republic of China, and makes a definite claim to the definitionof local literature as a science; and it discusses the compiling structure and method of thepeople’s chronicle particularly, which is unique theory in this field, and hence initiates a newstudy in this area. Thirdly, the thesis, taking Liang Qichao’s study on library science and hispractice on the spreading of literature as examples, makes a reference to his new idea onliterature which was produced in the modern, a academic transitional period. He devotedhimself to the setting up of libraries and all kinds of relevant activities. According to thefeatures of Chinese ancient books, Liang Qichao incorporating with Du Wei’s method,classified the catalogue of books into four types as academic, political, educational, andmiscellaneous, which was very convenient to readers. For the spreading of literature, LiangQichao opened schools, ran newspapers, translated and compiled books, which facilitated thespreading of the study of literature among the common people, and it had been proved that allhis efforts were effective. Generally, Liang Qichao’s theoretical system initiates a newliterature research in modern in Chinese history. In the conclusion part, the thesis dwells on thesocial and historical background under which Liang’s theory was produced, and his limit inliterature studies.The thesis mainly discusses Liang Qichao’s contribution to philology and its practice.Liang’s achievements in philology are an academic juncture between ancient and modernChina.
|
