论文标题:对外汉字教学研究——基础汉语教材的汉字教学内容分析
Study on the Difference of the Subjectivity of "Bing/Ke+Negation
论文作者 王瑞烽
论文导师 陈贤纯,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 课程与教学论
论文单位 北京语言文化大学,点击次数 273,论文页数 34页File Size1766k
2002-05-10论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_40069842/ 汉字教学;基础汉语教材;汉字知识;汉字练习;生字
Bing+negation";"Ke+negation";Subjectivity
本文研究的是基础汉语教学阶段的汉字教学。选取了北京大学、北京语言文化大学、复旦大学编写的包含“汉字教学内容”的13部基础汉语教材，根据它们“汉字教学内容”的编排方式分为两类，分别从汉字知识、汉字练习、所教的生字三个方面进行分析，并在此基础上讨论基础阶段汉字教学科学合理的方式。 本文分为四个部分。 第一部分：引言。包括本文的研究范围、研究价值、前人的研究。 第二部分：教材的分析研究。把13部教材分为两类，分别从汉字知识、汉字练习、所教的生字三个方面进行分析。 第三部分：总结。从基础汉语教材中汉字教学的改进和不足说明基础汉语教材中汉字教学的概貌。 第四部分：讨论。讨论基础阶段汉字教学科学、合理的解决方式。
Study on the Difference of the Subjectivity of "Bing/Ke+Negatinn"Adverbs in Chinese have uncertain lexical meaning, thus it is difficult to differentiate words with close lexical meaning through the way that study their connotation. As we all know, adverbs have the function of expressing the modality, and this is the aspect where the author proceed with the comparison of "Bing" and "Ke" with the usage before the negation.Through the corpus study of 6552 examples, we disclosed that, "Bing+ negation" and "Ke + negation" have obvious differences on the following aspects: modal words and punctuation at the end of the sentences, auxiliaries, predicates, first person vs. third person and context. From the comparison we can conclude that "Ke+negation" has high subjectivity while "Bing + negation" has low subjectivity. We also discovered that "Ke +negation" are more relative to the future time than "Bing + negation", that means "Ke + negation" is used to presuppose things and admonish people.Because of the difference on subjectivity, the lexical models of "Bing+negation" and "Ke+negation" have different categories, the lexical models with stronger subjectivity, such as declaration, admonition, dissuasion etc. are not adapted to "Bing+negation" pattern. Meanwhile, the lexical models with strong objectivity, such as attribute, object etc are not suitable for "Ke+negation" pattern. Although "Bing+negation" and "Ke+negation" have some common usage models, their subjectivities vary.The author starts from the perspective of single sentences, and proceeds into the study of interrelation among sentences, so as to disclose the substantial differences between "Bing+negation" and "Ke+negation". Using statistical methods, the author compared usage frequencies of examples on various aspects of subjectivity, and reached the conclusion that the subjectivity of "Bing+negation" is higher than "Ke+negation". It goes further on to describe the lexical models of "Bing+negation" and "Ke+negation".
|
