论文标题:10-16岁儿童诚信价值观现状的心理学研究
A Research on the "Cheng Xin" Value of Children at the Age from 10-16 Year-old
论文作者 李胜男
论文导师 岑国桢,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 发展与教育心理学
论文单位 上海师范大学,点击次数 421,论文页数 59页File Size251k
2003-05-01论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_4049682/ 诚 ; 信 ; 诚信 ; 价值观 ; 道德价值观 ; 价值观指征
Cheng" ; "Xin" ; "Cheng Xin" ; Values ; Moral Values ;Value Indicator
本研究以价值观辨析学派关于价值观形成过程的观点为依据，围绕“诚”和“信”编撰了四组道德情境故事，以此作为调查材料，对403名10-16岁中小学生组成的样本进行了测查，来调查我国儿童诚信价值观的现状。同时模拟了涉及“诚”的一个真实情境，对其中的81名12岁被试考察了他们在模拟情境中的行为表现。结果发现：（1）在诚信价值观的各项指征上，10-14岁儿童已基本具有了认知判断、行为倾向、内心体验和行为重复的价值观指征； 10-16岁儿童却都不具有情感分享的价值观指征；16岁儿童基本具有了认知判断、行为倾向和行为重复的价值观指征，他们在认知判断、行为倾向和内心体验上却均比10-14儿童较低，但行为重复倾向比10-14岁儿童较高。（2）在“一般投射”与“角色承担”两种投射情况之间，10-16岁儿童的行为倾向和内心体验在后一情况下比在前一情况下更为积极。（3）在“有诱因”与“无诱因”两种情境之间，10-16岁儿童的行为倾向在无诱因情境下比有诱因情境下更积极；在内心体验上，10岁组在两种情境之间没有差异，12岁和14岁儿童在无诱因情境下有更积极的内心体验，16岁儿童有诱因情境下有更积极的内心体验。（4）情境模拟中12岁儿童的真实行为表现与他们在问卷上的认知判断反应、行为倾向反应之间均存在明显的差异。（5）关于男女性别，除了在诚信价值观的认知判断指征上存在较显著的差异外，在其他方面均没有发现明显的差异。（6）在两个涉及“诚实”的故事之间、在两个涉及“守信”的故事之间、以及“诚实”方面的与“守信”方面的故事之间均存在明显的差异。
This research was based on the theory of the formation process of value, which was put forward by Value Clarification. In the research a questionnaire was used with 403 primary and middle school students aged from 10 to 16 year-old as subjects and four moral situational stories were compiled as stimulus materials to study "Cheng Xin". A real situation about "Cheng" was also designed as well. The results were as follows: (1) The 10,12,14-year-old children had the value indicators of cognitive- judgment, acting-incline, affective-experience and behavior-repeating-trend. The 16-year-old children had the value indicators of cognitive-judgment, acting-incline and behavior-repeating-trend, their scores on the aspects of cognitive-judgment, acting- incline and affective-experience were less than others, and their score on behaving-repeating-trend was higher than others.(2) Comparing the two different project situations, the scores of all subjects at different ages were higher in the "role-taking project" one than in the "general project" one.(3) Comparing the two incentive situations, the acting-incline was worse in the "having incentive" situation than in the "having no incentive " one, the affective -experience of children at age of 10-year-old had no difference between the two situations, and the affective-experience of children at age of 12-year-old and 14-year-old were much positive in the "having no incentive" situation than in the other, and the children at the age of 16-year-old was more positive in the "having incentive" situation than in the other. (4) Comparing the behaviors in the real situation with the cognitive-judgment and the acting-incline in the questionnaire, there were differences between them. (5) No sex differences were found in the research except on the cognitive- judgment on "Cheng Xin".(6) There were differences between the two stories about "Cheng", the two stories about "Xin", the "Cheng" and the "Xin".
|
