论文标题:后霍梅尼时代的伊朗政治发展研究
Political Developments in Post-Khomeini Iran
论文作者
论文导师 王铁铮,论文学位 博士,论文专业 世界史
论文单位 西北大学,点击次数 576,论文页数 162页File Size9364K
2007-04-01论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_4098952/
Faqih system; Political Development; the Relation between Religion and State; Modernization; Religious Ddemocracy
本论文以马克思唯物主义政治发展观为基本研究理论，坚持历史与现实相结合、理论与实践相结合、具体问题具体分析的原则，对后霍梅尼时代的伊朗政治发展进行研究。在写作方法上，采用历史学的阶段分析法和专题论述法，从横向和纵向两个角度对霍梅尼之后的伊朗政治进行梳理和深入研究。同时，论文将彭树智先生的“文明交往论’’作为主要指导理论之一，借鉴和吸收了西方政治发展理论中有益的研究理论和方法。论文通过对后霍梅尼时代伊朗错综复杂的政教关系、传统与现代、革命和革新等多种因素的分析，对伊朗伊斯兰政治体制本身及其演变的研究，探究伊朗政治变迁的本质。 论文第一章主要对中西方的政治发展理论作了比较研究，在坚持唯物主义政治发展观的同时，对伊斯兰教和政治发展理论的关系进行了探讨，进而明确了伊朗政治发展研究的方法和研究范畴。 第二章对伊斯兰革命及其革命后霍梅尼的十年之治进行了探讨，主要从政治、经济、文化和外交四大方面进行论述，重点就革命和伊斯兰化政策对伊朗政治体制、国家决策、社会意识形态和国内争论等方面产生的影响进行了分析。 第三、四章则主要是对哈梅内伊时代的两任总统——拉夫桑贾尼和哈塔米的政治改革理论和实践进行了分析，论文在展现不同时期伊朗政治发展现状的同时，对二人执政时期的改革得失进行了剖析。 第五、六章主要对后霍梅尼时代伊朗政治发展的特点和影响伊朗未来政治发展的因素进行了分析。第七章则在结合当前伊朗政治现状的基础上提出了研究伊朗政治发展问题的要点。 基于以上研究成果，本论文得出以下结论：1、法吉赫体制作为伊朗政治制度的核心，在伊朗的政治变迁中既是改革的体制框架，也是国内争论的焦点，面临着合法性危机。2、来自民间的民主化要求既为伊朗政府改革提供了动力和民意支持，也为伊朗政治发展带来了不稳定因素。3、后霍梅尼时代，尽管伊朗政治发展路途艰难，但改革的趋势不可逆转。4、美伊关系问题和美国的中东改造计划对伊朗的政治民主化和现代化提出了挑战。
Based on the Maxist historical materialism which stresses on the relationship between the history and reality, theory and practice, the dissertation focuses on the studies of Iran"s political developments since the death of Khomeini, who was the first religious leader of Islamic Republic of Iran. As far as the method, borrowing some valuable theories from the western political science, the author adopts the "the Review of Civilization Exchange", proposed by Peng Shuzhi who is a professor of Nothwest University in China, as one of the main instructing theories. By terms of Iran"s political system emerging under the context of Islamic civilization, the dissertation attempts to take Iran as a case study to probe the democratization and modernization in the Middle East by discussing the relationship between religion and state, tradition and modernity, revolution and evolution in post-Khomeini Iran. The first chapter concentrates on the comparative research of theories of the political development proposed by western and eastern scholars. The dissertation defines the research method and scope in this part by the analysis of Islam, politics and developments. The second chapter considers the Islamic Revolution as the starting point of the research, analyzing its compacts on political system, national policy-making, ideology and domestic disputes brought by the revolution, In the third and fourth chapters, the respectively political reform in Rafsanjani and Khatami"s presidencies are the main tasks, which include the comparison of both the strong and weak points. The fifth and sixth chapters summarize the characteristics of Iran"s political developments and the factors that have influenced and will still influence Iran"s politics. In the last chapter, the author proposes the main research points which are important for Iranian studies. On the basis of the research above, the dissertation makes a conclusion: (i)In Iran"s political evolution, the Faqih system, as the core of political regime, is the focus of the domestic disputes. (ii) Demanding of democracy and modernity from the civil society provides the motivation and driving force for the governmental reform and also brings about some unstable factors. (iii) In post-Khomeini Iran, the trend of reform is inevitable as facing some challenges. (iv) The relationship between ban and America and the Greater Middle Eastern Initiative challenge the process of Iran "s democrazation and modernization.
|
