论文标题:合同地域管辖审查制度探析
Research on the Examining System of the Territorial Jurisdiction of Contract
论文作者
论文导师 梅夏英,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 民事诉讼法
论文单位 对外经济贸易大学,点击次数 606,论文页数 27页File Size1176K
2007-10-01论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_462447/
Agreement on jurisdiction;;loci solutionis;;forum domicilii
我国地域管辖制度存在诸多问题,合同地域管辖问题尤其突出。究其原因,是确定合同地域管辖的标准存在不确定性和模糊性。这一问题要在遵循一定的原则下,从审查客体及审查模式两个方面进行完善。在确定合同地域管辖时,至少要遵循尊重当事人的程序权利原则、辩论主义原则和不方便法院原则。合同地域管辖的审查客体包括管辖协议、合同履行地、被告住所地。管辖协议有效须具备三个要件,即须在法定范围内选择管辖法院,当事人协议选择的法院必须明确,管辖协议须以书面形式订立。确定合同履行地要遵循书面明确约定的合同履行地规则,合同特征义务履行地规则以及合同主要义务履行地规则。自然人的户籍所在地与经常居住地不应相互排斥,当事人应可以选择,并且不应有期限限制。被告是法人的,当事人可以选择登记的主要办事机构或主要营业所在地法院管辖,如果是与法人分支机构发生纠纷的,当事人还可以选择分支机构主要营业地法院管辖。确定合同地域管辖审查模式存在标准不统一,审查程序职权化,对当事人的程序权利保障不够地问题。形式审查为主存在当事人规避管辖,法院滥用职权,以及当事人滥用管辖异议权等问题,这些问题可以通过完善配套制度来解决。(全文共计18576字)
There are a good many defects in our territorial jurisdiction system, especially in territorial jurisdiction of contract. It is because that the standards to confirm the territorial jurisdiction of contract are too dubious and blurry. Following some principles, these problems might be solved from two aspects, namely, examined object and examined mode. When confirming territorial jurisdiction of contract, we should at least keep to three principles, the principle of parties’rights to action procedure, adversary doctrine as well as forum non conveniens. The examined objects of territorial jurisdiction of contract include the agreement on jurisdiction, loci solutionis and forum domicilii. The valid agreement on jurisdiction must be provided with three elements, namely, to choose jurisdictional court within legal scope, to choose specific court, and to conclude the agreement on jurisdiction in writing. The confirmation of loci solutionis should comply with some rules, such as the rule of loci solutionis being plighted in written form, the rule of confirming jurisdictional court according to loci solutionis of characteristic obligation, and the rule of confirming jurisdictional court according to loci solutionis of primary obligation. The place of domicile of natural person and habitual residence of natural person should not be exclusive; the parties can choose either. The habitual residence can be confirmed in accordance with the relation to the case without period restriction. If the defendant is legal person, the parties can choose the court in primary administrative locality or primary business locality. If the defendant is the separation of an artificial person, the parties can choose the court in primary business locality of the separation of an artificial person. There are some problems in the examined mode of territorial jurisdiction of contract, such as, the criterion is not uniform, the procedure of examination is administrative, and it is inadequate to ensure parties’rights of action procedure.The defects of the formal examination are obvious, for instance, the parties evading jurisdiction, the court abusing its authority, and the parties abusing right to disagreement. However, these problems can be solved by the perfection of corresponding systems.
|
