论文标题:我国高等教育筹资问题分析
The Analysis of the Fund-raising Problems of Higher Education in Our Country
论文作者
论文导师 高金岭,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 教育经济与管理
论文单位 广西师范大学,点击次数 19,论文页数 59页File Size647K
2006-03-01论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_784204127/
Higher education; fund-raising; problems; government; efficiency
论文以经济学作为视角,运用经济学、财政学和教育学的基本理论,对我国高等教育筹资问题进行分析,并尝试有针对性地提出一些政策性建议和主张。研究方法是以规范分析为主,辅之以实证分析。 课题源自于对我国高等教育经费短缺,同时高等教育资源利用效率不尽如人意等等问题的关注。 论文共分三部分。第一部分是高等教育筹资的一般理论分析。首先从公共产品理论角度、效率与公平理论角度说明政府负担高等教育的作用及公共财政政策或政府财政职责的选择性,再论述了高等教育筹资中的非政府因素:个人投资接受高等教育、民间投资提供高等教育和利用市场融通资金,最后进行总体分析,阐明高等教育应采取多元筹资,政府主导,同时高校合理配置资金。第二部分对我国高等教育筹资实践进行分析,说明在改革开放以来,我国高等教育筹资虽然取得了一定的进步,但也存在诸多不足,当前我国高等教育经费短缺的问题仍愈加突出,并且同时也存在着高等教育资源利用效率不高的问题,主要从宏观层面的筹资政策与微观层面的运行机制两方面表现出来,总的来说表现为总体投资规模偏低,投融资结构不尽合理。第三部分借鉴国外经验,尝试性的就我国高等教育筹资实践中存在的问题有针对性的提出一些政策性建议和主张,提出在宏观层面上进一步改革完善高等教育筹资政策,在政府主导的基础上多渠道筹措教育经费,微观层面上改革高等学校内部管理机制,优化教育资源配置。 论文的主要观点:(1)高等教育属于准公共产品,应采取市场提供与政府提供相结合的混合提供方式,由政府对私人部门提供的教育服务进行财政补贴。(2)高等教育筹资来源包括政府投资、接受教育者个人投资、民间投资和市场融资,其中,政府是主导。高校要尽可能地合理配置资金,提高高等教育资源的利用效率。(3)我国高等教育已经打破了以往由政府财政包揽经费的局面,基本形成了多元筹资的模式。然而,经费短缺的问题仍愈加突出,并且同时也存在着高等教育资源利用效率不高等问题。(4)宏观层面上进一步改革完善高等教育筹资政策,在政府主导的基础上多渠道筹措教育经费,微观层面上改革高等学校内部管理机制,优化教育资源配置。
This paper analyzes the fund-raising problems of higher education in our country and then attempts to present some policy-suggestions on them from the angle of view of economics basing the basic theories of economics, finances and educations by the research methods of normative and positive analysis. So come the research because of paying attention to the problems that the shortage of funds for the Chinese higher education and the low efficiency of allocation of educational resources. There are three parts in this paper. Part 1 mainly normatively analyzes the fund-raising of higher education. The government must offer higher education according to the theory of public products and the option of government fiscal policy is important according to the theory of efficiency and equity. Non-governmental fund-raising comprises: the educatee investing to accept higher education, the local people investing to offer higher education and the market financing. However, government financial support is a major source while multiple channels and rationally allocating the funds are necessary. Part 2 analyzes the practice of fund-raising in our country. Though some improvement has been made after the reform and opening policy, there still exist some problems. They are showed on macro-level policy making aspect and micro-level operating mechanism as: the total scale of investment is still small; the structure of financing is irrational. Part 3 attempts to present some policy-suggestions using the experience of other countries for reference: to improve the fund-raising policy on macro-level to adhere to raising funds from multiple channels while government playing a leading role; to reform the interior management mechanism of higher learning on micro-level to optimize the allocating of educational resources. The main views of this paper are: (1) higher education should be offered by government and market as it is quasi-public product, and the private sectors which offer the higher education should be subsidized by the government. (2) The resources of higher educational funds comprises: government investment, educatee investment, local people investment and market financing, among them, the government plays a leading role, meanwhile the institutions of higher learning should allocate the resources as rational as possible to enhance the efficiency. (3) It has been changed that the government offers higher education exclusively while multiple financing has been basically formed in our country, but the problems that the shortage of funds and the low efficiency of allocation are still exist. (4) To improve the fund-raising policy on macro-level to adhere to raising funds from multiple channels while government playing a leading role; to reform the interior management mechanism of higher learning on micro-level to optimize the allocating of educational resources.
|
