论文标题:（？）组甲骨文献的整理与研究
The Quest of Wholeness
论文作者 蒋玉斌
论文导师 董莲池,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 中国古典文献学
论文单位 东北师范大学,点击次数 623,论文页数 88页File Size3047k
2003-05-01论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_801652/ 甲骨文献;(?)组;整理;研究
document of oracle bones and shells;shi(?)-group;collation;research
甲骨学经过百余年的发展，至今已达到了相当高的水平。在甲骨卜辞的分类断代有了突破性进展的今天，充分吸收甲骨研究的新成果，重新审视各类卜辞，一类一类、一组一组地对甲骨进行系统而细致的整理与研究，是十分必要的。我们从事(?)组甲骨文献的整理与研究，就是想在这一方面做一些工作。 甲骨学研究必须重视文献材料的完整性和准确性。在这一方面，我们本次缀合(?)组甲骨共7组，并汇集诸家在《甲骨文合集》之后的缀合新成果，共得49组；指出《合集》(?)组中的误缀7例，总结《甲骨文合集补编》中本组误缀6组，以提醒使用者免受误导；补校本组《合集》重片1组，《合补》3组，加上诸家所校分别有44组和43组，也以表格的形式列出。新近出版的《合补》美中不足的是释文、按语中存在一些不妥之处，本文也对其中的(?)组部分进行了校订。《合集》所划的(?)组部分杂有不少其他组类的卜辞，本文指出，其中的19803和19849两片实际上是与最近出土的花园庄东地H3卜辞同类的，它们是H3“子”卜辞，而不是王卜辞。我们希望通过以上的校订、增补，为(?)组甲骨的研究提供一个较好的文献基础。 在这些材料的基础上，我们又选择了两个专题，对(?)组小字A类所谓的“月比斗”“夕从斗”卜辞和(?)组大字类祭祀卜辞进行了穷尽性的考察，用较坚实的材料检讨既往的论点，又从材料中总结解决问题的有效信息，提出了自己的一些看法。 在前一个专题中，我们指出“丙子卜：夕。丁从斗”这类卜辞是卜夕(占卜夜间情况)辞，“斗”上一字应读为“从”，以往认为卜辞中的“夕／月”字可作祭名，都是不可靠的。后一个专题通过对(?)组大字类祭祀卜辞的考察，对其中反映出来的商王武丁早期的祭祀对象、祭祀用牲、祭仪及祭法、卜祭之日日干与先人日名的关系等作了梳理。使用甲骨材料必须保证文字考释的可靠性，我们专作《兄庚”辨误》一节，附在论文最后，从文字学上对曾被认为是“兄庚”的称谓进行了辨正。
After more than a hundred years" development, the study of oracle bones and shells has improved to a rather high level. Since nowadays both categorization and periodization of oracle inscriptions have achieved breakthroughs, it is necessary to assimilate the new achievements of study, to review the various kinds of inscription and to conduct systematic and comprehensive arrangement and research according to category and group. Therefore we want to do some work in this field by studying the Shi (?) -group oracle bones and shells.Considering that this study relies much on the exhaustiveness and accuracy of documents, we got altogether 49 groups of oracle bones and shells by rejoining 7 groups ourselves in addition to the newly discovered 42 groups by other experts in Jiaguwen Heji 甲骨文合集. We also mentioned 7 inappropriate rejoins about the Shi(?) -group in Heji and 6 in Jiagwven Heji Supplement 甲骨文合集补编 in order to remind the users of them. Moreover, we made tables for 1 group of repetition about Shi(?) -group in Heji as well as 3 in its supplement in addition to the 44 groups in Heji and 43 groups in the supplement discovered by other experts. There are shortcomings in the notes of newly published Supplement to which this paper also tries to correct the Shife -group part. The Shife -group part categorized in Heji is mixed with the inscription of other groups. We pointed out that the two pieces 19803rd and 19849th are actually the same kind with the newly unearthed oracle bones in Ash-pit H3 at Huayuanzhuang Locus East. They are inscriptions of H3 "Zi 子", but not of the "king 王". We hope to provide a documentary basis for the study of oracle bones through the above corrections and supplements.Based on these materials, we are here to choose two topics for discussion, that is, the exhaustive research toward theso-called "月比斗" or "夕从斗" inscriptions of category A in the Shi(?) -group smaller-character oracleinscription and the sacrificial inscriptions of greater-character one.Then we come to the first conclusion that these are inscriptions of divining conditions of night and the letter in front of "Dou 斗" should be read as "Cong 从". It is not reliable to think that the letter "Xi 夕"in inscription can be used as the names of sacrificial ceremony. Second, we get a general understanding of the conditions to the sacrificial oracle inscriptions of greater-character through the research of them.Reliability of character study must be guaranteed in the process of consulting documents of oracle bones and shells. We also write the section A Critical Study of "兄庚" to rectify the idea of addressing "兄庚" from the philological perspective.
|
