论文标题:WTO下的司法审查制度
Judicial Review System in WTO
论文作者 李丽智
论文导师 李冬梅,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 国际法学
论文单位 大连海事大学,点击次数 123,论文页数 58页File Size2289k
2004-09-01论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_82411722/ WTO;司法审查;行政行为
WTO; Judicial Review; Political Behavior
我国已加入WTO,司法审查制度在WTO协议体系中具有至关重要的地位.本文首先从三个方面分析了司法审查制度产生的条件,对各国司法审查制度进行了比较,从而对司法审查制度的内涵和价值作出界定,同时介绍了与司法审查制度有关的其他制度.然后本文介绍了WTO的法律框架,阐述了司法审查制度在WTO法律体系中的地位、作用及其特点,分析司法审查与WTO争端解决机制的关系。司法审查制度最早源自美国,西方国家的相关制度比较完善。我国相关立法与实践相对滞后,中国加入WTO议定书对司法审查作出了郑重承诺。本文介绍了我国履行承诺在立法与司法实践方面的情况,对中国现有司法审查制度进行了评价。最后,提出完善中国司法审查制度的几点建议,主要有:转变观念,由行政主导转向法治主导,彻底克服地方保护主义与部门保护主义的观念,克服重实体轻程序的观念;扩大司法审查的范围,全面保护当事人的合法权益,将抽象行政行为纳入司法审查的范围,将行政终局行为纳入司法审查的范围;建立公正、正当的司法审查标准;确保司法审查机关的独立性;提高司法审查人员的素质。总之,我国现行的司法审查制度只要与时俱进,不断创新,就能适应时代发展的要求。
China had joined WTO already, judicial reviev system played a very important role in the agreenment system of WTO. Firstly the article analyzes the conditions of judicial review to come into exstence in three factors and it makes comparion of judicial review system with every countries, further it makes the def ination about conotation and value of the judicial review system. At the same time it introduces the legal frame of WTO. The artical analyzes the relationship between judicial review and the mechanism of settle dispute in WTO. The judicial review system initially originated in American. Ours relational legislation and practice comparatively fall behind West countries. The protocol of China joined the WTO had makd a serious promise to judicial review. The artical introduces the situation of our country perform the promise in legislation and judicial practice, it also makes a evaluation of present judicial review system. At last,it suggests a few suggestion in perfecting Chinese judicial review system. Main suggestions are:transform concept, from policial dominationto legal donination, thoroughly overcome the concept of local protection and drpartmental protection;as well as overcome the concept of taking seriously with substance and pay less attention to procedure;extend the range of judicial review, fully protect the legitimate right of litigant;put the abstract political behavior and terminal behavior into the scope of judicial review;establish the criterion of judicial review with fair and legitimacy;ensure the independence of judicial review organ; improve the quality of judicial review staff;in short, only has present judicial review system improving with the day passing and constanly bring forth new ideas can we keep abreast of the times.
|
