论文标题:论行政垄断的法律规制 Research and Measure of the Parameter of the Economic Welfare of Chinese Trade 论文作者 程益群 论文导师 李雅云,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 法学理论 论文单位 中共中央党校,点击次数 130,论文页数 35页File Size1743k 2003-05-20论文网 http://www.lw23.com/lunwen_94588992/ 行政垄断;法律规制;反垄断立法 administrative monopoly, legal regulation, anti-monopoly legislation 行政垄断是传统计划经济体制遗留下来的问题,我国正处于建立市场经济体制过程中,存在大量滥用行政权力限制竞争的行为。行政垄断不仅普遍存在,而且严重阻碍了有序竞争的形成和市场经济体制的完善。本文首先分析了行政垄断的概念、成因及其表现形式,在此基础上,提出了规制行政垄断的法律措施。 文章由四个部分组成。第一部分,作者在界定了行政垄断的含义之后,分析了行政垄断的特征,并对行政垄断与经济垄断、自然垄断和国家垄断等相关概念进行了区分。第二部分,论文详尽分析了行政垄断的四种表现形式:地区封锁、行业垄断、政府限定交易和强制联合限制竞争;并探讨了行政垄断的巨大危害和主要成因。分析了规制行政垄断的必要性。第三部分,文章对市场经济国家和转型国家行政垄断的规制进行了比较研究之后认为,我国应反行政垄断法律制度尚不健全,应借鉴世界各国反行政垄断的经验,制定统一的反垄断法,明确其法律责任,建立权威性的执法机构。最后,作者就如何完善反垄断法以有效规制行政垄断提出了立法建议。 Administrative monopoly is a problem left over from the traditional system of planned economy. In the process of setting up a market economy system in China today, administrative power is often exercised to restrict competition. The universally existing administrative monopoly proves a serious hindrance to the development of ordered competition and the market economy system. The thesis makes an analysis of the concept, causes and manifestation of administrative monopoly and on the basis of the foregoing discussion, puts forward legal counter measures to regulate itThe thesis is composed of five parts. In the first part, the thesis analyses the composition of administrative monopoly after defining its concept, and points out that administrative monopoly is different from economic monopoly, natural monopoly and state monopoly. In the second part, the thesis makes a detailed explanation of the following categories of administrative monopoly behavior: regional blockade, sector monopoly, compulsory transaction behavior and compulsory associated restriction of competition, and probes into the tremendous harm and the main causes of the administrative monopoly. In the third part, the thesis makes comparative study about the clear-cut regulation on administrative monopoly in both market economic countries and transitional countries, and points out our country should borrow the experience of them. In the last part, the writer gives some advice on how to perfect anti-monopoly law to regulate effectively administrative monopoly.
|